TEOREMA DE LYAPUNOV- DEMOSTRACIÓN. BÚSQUEDA DE FUNCIONES DE LYAPUNOV. BÚSQUEDA DE FUNCIONES DE LYAPUNOV. BÚSQUEDA. This MATLAB function solves the special and general forms of the Lyapunov equation. funciones de Lyapunov; analisis númerico. 1 Introduction. The synchronization of electrical activity in the brain occurs as the result of interaction among sets of.

Author: | Yobar Zuluzahn |

Country: | Luxembourg |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Business |

Published (Last): | 7 January 2018 |

Pages: | 291 |

PDF File Size: | 16.29 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 20.43 Mb |

ISBN: | 509-4-44102-359-3 |

Downloads: | 36233 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | Akikazahn |

Instead, each element of approaches to constant values in the sense of expectation with respect to. All Examples Functions Blocks Apps. Especially for a constant referencewhen approaches to zero in the sense of expectation with respect to as k approaches to infinity, from Eq. The overall stability of a self-tuning control algorithm, based on recursive controller parameter estimation including a forgetting factor and generalized minimum variance criterion, for a class of time-varying systems, has been proved based on the discrete-time sliding mode control theory.

Self-tuning control, generalized minimum variance control, sliding-mode control, discrete-time systems, time-varying systems, Lyapunov function. The main results are the theorems which assure the overall stability of the closed-loop system, which are proved in a straight way compared with previous stability analysis results.

The error signal is defined aswhere is the reference signal. For the nominal controller design using the GMVC presented in section 2, the following polynomials are chosen: The parameters of the control law for the real systems with unknown parameters are estimated using a recursive least-squares RLS algorithm.

Self-tuning control of time-varying systems based on GMVC. The idea is similar to the discrete-time sliding mode control [3]. En forma revisada el 10 de Enero de Note that using the same Lyapunov candidate one can show that the equilibrium is also globally asymptotically stable. These commands return the following X matrix: Figure 2 shows the output responses when, after samples, the system model in Eq. In the following, the proposed algorithm in Eq.

In the Laplace transformation, the time-shift operator is described as where is the sampling period for simplicity, lyapunlv without loss of generality, is assumed. Given a positive definite matrixa parameter and an initial parameters luapunovif the estimate of the controller in Eq. Anna Patete 1Katsuhisa Furuta 2.

Description lyap solves the special and general forms of the Lyapunov equation. MathWorks does not warrant, and disclaims all gunciones for, the accuracy, suitability, or fitness for purpose of the translation. The converse is also true, and was proved by J. However, all these researches have been done for time-invariant systems TIS. Click here to see To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

Estabilidad de controladores auto-ajustables para sistemas variantes en el tiempo basada en funciones Lyapunov. The controller design with the GMVC based on the sliding mode control concept, in the case of time-invariant systems [3, 6, 7], is reviewed in this section. The matrices ABand C must have compatible dimensions but need not be square.

Lyapunov equations arise in several areas of control, including ljapunov theory and the study of the RMS behavior of systems. From the fourth term of Eq. Using the control law in Eq. For robust stability analysis, we may use the method by Tsypkin [10] for closed-loop discrete-time systems, which involves the modified characteristic locus criterion.

The necessary and sufficient condition for the control input to make stable is that all the roots of the polynomial: Equation 2 is rewritten as: Whereandare the upper and lower bounds of andrespectively.

### Continuous Lyapunov equation solution – MATLAB lyap

As shown, does not intersect with the critical circlewhich implies that the sufficient condition for robust stability is satisfied. We do not prove, or claim, that converges to its true values q. The results have been extended to the case where system and measurement noises are considered into the system model.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the stability of the implicit self-tuning controller for discrete time-varying systems TVS and discrete time-varying systems subject to system and measurement noises. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.

## Select a Web Site

llyapunov You must use empty square brackets [] for this function. The degree of polynomial iswhich implies that depends only on future states of x. In the case where the uncertainties come from parametric perturbations, we have a family of closed-loop characteristic polynomials instead of a single nominal characteristic polynomial. Wikipedia articles incorporating text from PlanetMath. The discrete-time single-input single-output SISO time-invariant system is considered.

The important issue on self-tuning control includes the stability, performance and convergence of involved recursive algorithms. Recibido el 8 de Diciembre de By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

From the third term on the right-hand side of Eq. The nominal system model and the family of system models to be considered in this section are lgapunov as: The control objective is to minimize the variance of the controlled variablesdefined in the deterministic case as: The polynomial is chosen Schur and should be designed by assigning all characteristic roots inside the unit disk in the funcjones. If you place any lyapunpv inside the brackets, the function errors out.

It has been proved [6, 7] that the following self-tuning algorithm assures the overall stability for SISO time invariant systems, when the system constant parameters are not accurately known, by the recursive estimation of the controller parameters andunder the following assumptions. Finally, by taking the expectation with respect to in 28Eq.